Don’t see the recipe you’re looking for? Request or add a recipe by opening an issue on GitHub.
You can use the db_create
method as follows:
r.db_create("blog").run
Another way to create a database is through the web UI. You can reach
the web UI at http://HOST:8080
. Click on the Tables tab at the top
and then use the Add Database button.
The easiest way to rename a database is to use the config command to access the db_config
system table, and then simply use the update
command.
r.db("old_db_name").config().update({:name => "new_db_name"}).run
You can select the database where you’d like to create the table with
the db
command and use the table_create
command as follows:
r.db("blog").table_create("posts").run
Note that you can omit the db
command if you’re creating a table in
the default database on your connection (set to test
unless
specified in connect
).
Another way to create a new table is to use the web UI. You can reach
the web UI at http://HOST:8080
. Click on the Tables tab at the top
of the page and then use the Add Table button.
You can insert documents by calling the insert
command on the
appropriate table:
r.table("user").insert({
"name" => "Michel",
"age" => 26
}).run
You can insert multiple documents at once by passing an array of
documents to insert
as follows:
r.table("user").insert([
{
"name" => "Michel",
"age" => 26
},
{
"name" => "Slava",
"age" => 30
}
]).run
To delete documents, select the documents you’d like to delete and use
the delete
command. For example, let’s delete all posts with the
author “Michel”:
r.table("posts").filter{|post| post["author"].eq("Michel")}.delete.run
Or, let’s try to delete a single user:
r.table("posts").get("7644aaf2-9928-4231-aa68-4e65e31bf219").delete.run
Here is how we’d delete all documents in a table:
r.table("posts").delete.run
To get all documents in a table, simply use the table
command:
r.table("posts").run()
The table
command returns a cursor; use the next or each command to iterate through the result set, or to_a to retrieve the set as an array.
To get a specific document by ID, use get
:
r.table("posts").get(1).run()
To retrieve documents by the value of a specific field, use filter
:
r.table("posts").filter({:author => "Michel"}).run()
To retrieve documents by the value of a specific index, use get_all
:
r.table("posts").get_all("review", {:index => "category"}).run()
(For more complex filtering recipes, read on.)
Suppose you’d like to select all posts where the author’s name is “Michel” and the category is “Geek”. You can do it as follows:
r.table("posts").filter({
"author" => "Michel",
"category" => "Geek",
}).run
Alternatively, you can use the overloaded &
operator to build a
predicate and pass it to filter
:
r.table("posts").filter{|post|
(post["author"].eq("Michel")) & (post["category"].eq("Geek"))
}.run
Note: RethinkDB overloads &
because Ruby doesn’t allow
overloading the proper and operator. Since &
has high precedence,
make sure to wrap the conditions around it in parentheses.
You can also use the r.and
command, if you prefer not using
overloaded &
:
r.table("posts").filter{|post|
r.and(post["author"].eq("Michel"),
post["category"].eq("Geek"))}.run
Similarly, you can use the overloaded |
operator or the equivalent
r.or
command to filter based on one of many conditions.
Suppose we have a table users
with documents of the following form:
{
"name" => "William Adama"
"emails" => ["bill@bsg.com", "william@bsg.com"],
"ship" => "Galactica"
}
If we want to retrieve all users that have the email address
user@email.com
, we can write:
r.table("user").filter{|user| user["emails"].contains("user@email.com")}.run
If we want to retrieve all users on the Galactica and Pegasus, we can write:
r.table("user").filter{ |user|
r.expr(["Galactica", "Pegasus"]).contains(user["ship"])
}.run()
In Ruby you can use the operator []
to get the value of a
field. This operator can be chained to retrieve values from nested
fields.
Suppose we have a table users
with documents of the following form:
{
"name" => "William Adama"
"contact" => {
"phone" => "555-5555"
"email" => "bill@bsg.com"
}
}
Let’s filter based on the nested field email
:
r.table("user").filter{|user|
user["contact"]["email"].eq("user@email.com")
}.run
For many ReQL commands, you can also use a JSON-style nested syntax that allows considerably more flexibility. Read “Accessing nested fields” for more information.
If you want to retrieve all the posts with the primary keys 1
, 2
,
or 3
you can use the get_all
command:
r.table("posts").get_all(1, 2, 3).run
Suppose we have a table posts
that links posts to authors via an
author_id
field. If we’ve created a secondary index on author_id
and want to retrieve all the posts where author_id
is 1
, 2
, or
3
, we can use the get_all
command to do it as follows:
r.table("posts").get_all(1, 2, 3, :index=>'author_id').run
Read about creating secondary indexes in RethinkDB.
If you’re using a command that returns a stream and want to retrieve all of
its results at once in an array rather than iterating through them with the
cursor object, you can coerce it to an array using to_a
.
posts = r.table('posts').run(conn).to_a
See the data type documentation for more detail about streams.
If you need to retrieve only a few specific fields from your
documents, you can use the pluck
command. For example, here is how
you’d return only the fields name
and age
from each row in table
users
:
r.table("posts").pluck("name", "age").run
This is equivalent to calling SELECT name, age FROM users
in SQL.
The pluck
command also supports selecting nested fields in a
document. For example, suppose we’d like to select the fields phone
and email
from the following document:
{
"name" => "William Adama"
"contact" => {
"phone" => "555-5555"
"email" => "bill@bsg.com"
}
}
We can use the following syntax:
r.table("users").pluck({"contact"=>{"phone"=>true, "email"=>true}}).run
Suppose you want to retrieve all the posts whose date field is between January 1st, 2012 (included) and January 1st, 2013 (excluded), you could do:
r.table("posts").filter{ |post|
post.during(r.time(2012, 1, 1, 'Z'), r.time(2013, 1, 1, 'Z'))
}.run(conn)
You can also manually compare dates:
r.table("posts").filter{ |post|
(post["date"] >= r.time(2012, 1, 1, 'Z')) &
(post["date"] < r.time(2013, 1, 1, 'Z'))
}.run(conn)
If you want to retrieve all users whose last name starts with “Ma”,
you can use r.match
this way:
# Will return Martin, Martinez, Marshall etc.
r.table("users").filter{ |user|
user["lastName"].match("^Ma")
}.run(conn)
If you want to retrieve all users whose last name ends with an “s”,
you can use r.match
this way:
# Will return Williams, Jones, Davis etc.
r.table("users").filter{ |user|
user["lastName"].match("s$")
}.run(conn)
If you want to retrieve all users whose last name contains “ll”,
you can use r.match
this way:
# Will return Williams, Miller, Allen etc.
r.table("users").filter{ |user|
user["lastName"].match("ll")
}.run(conn)
Retrieve all users whose name is “William” (case insensitive).
# Will return william, William, WILLIAM, wiLLiam etc.
r.table("users").filter{ |user|
user["lastName"].match("(?i)^william$")
}.run(conn)
If you want to perform a query that returns aggregations on different fields together, this is a canonical use case for map-reduce.
Suppose a data set that lists top movies, ranked by user vote. You’d like to get the total votes and the average age of the top 25 movies: the avg()
of the year
column and the sum()
of the votes
column, ordered by the rank
column to get the range 1–25.
To perform this, map the first 25 movies into a new result set, adding a count
column, then reduce each row of the mapped result set into a total for each field (votes
, year
and column
). Then use do to return a result set with the total votes and the average year, computed by dividing the sum of the years by their count.
r.table('movies').order_by('rank').limit(25).map{ |doc|
{ :total_votes => doc['votes'], :total_year => doc['year'], :count => 1 }
}.reduce{ |left, right|
:total_votes => (left['total_votes'] + right['total_votes']),
:total_year => (left['total_year'] + right['total_year']),
:count => (left['count'] + right['count'])
}.do{ |res|
:total_votes => res['total_votes'],
:average_year => (res['total_year'] / res['count'])
}.run(conn)
To add or overwrite a field, you can use the update
command. For
instance, if you would like to add the field author
with the value
“Michel” for all of the documents in the table posts
, you would use:
r.table("posts").update({ "author" => "Michel" }).run
The update
command lets you to overwrite fields, but not delete
them. If you want to delete a field, use the replace
command. The
replace
command replaces your entire document with the new document
you pass as an argument. For example, if you want to delete the field
author
of the blog post with the id 1
, you would use:
r.table("posts").get("1").replace{|doc| doc.without('author')}.run
All modifications made via the update
and replace
commands are
always atomic with respect to a single document. For example, let’s
say we’d like to atomically update a view count for a page if the
field countable
is set to true, and get back the old and new results
in a single query. We can perform this operation as follows:
r.table("pages").update{|page|
r.branch(page["countable"].eq(true), // if the page is countable
{ "views"=>page["views"] + 1 }, // increment the view count
{} // else do nothing
)}, {"return_changes"=>true}).run()
Using a similar technique to the last recipe, we can use branch
and replace
to maintain a document’s updated_at
and created_at
fields by either inserting a new document or updating one depending on whether a document with a specified ID exists.
def update_with_date(id, user_object)
r.table('users').get(id).replace{ |doc| r.branch(
(doc == nil),
r.expr(user_object).merge({:id => id, :created_at => r.now()}),
doc.merge(user_object).merge({:updated_at => r.now()})
).run()
end
You can use the epoch_time
and iso8601
commands to convert Unix timestamps (in seconds) and JSON date-time strings (which are in ISO 8601 format) to the ReQL time type. The ReQL driver will also convert Ruby Time objects into ReQL time, but will not automatically convert Date or DateTime objects.
the_date = Time.now
timestamp = the_date.to_i
json_date = the_date.iso8601
r.table("dates").insert({
:from_object => the_date,
:from_epoch => r.epoch_time(timestamp),
:from_iso => r.iso8601(json_date)
}).run(conn)
It’s possible to increment a field value in a document—for example, a counter—in one step on the server.
r.table('aggregated').get(id).update{ |doc|
{ :count => (doc['count'].default(0)+1) }
}.run(conn)
Use default
to ensure that if the count
field doesn’t already exist in the document, it’s added correctly, rather than letting add
throw an error.
You can limit the number of documents returned by your queries with
the limit
command. Let’s retrieve just the first 10 blog posts:
r.table("posts").order_by("date")
.limit(10)
.run
There are multiple ways to paginate results in RethinkDB. The most straightforward way is using skip
and limit
(similar to the way SQL’s OFFSET
and LIMIT
work), but that’s also the least efficient. It’s more efficient to use slice
, and even more efficient to use between
with a secondary index.The slice command returns a range from a given start value through but not including a given end value. This makes it easy to use as a skip
/limit
replacement: the start value is the first item to retrieve, and the end value is the first item plus the limit. To retrieve posts 11-20 from the database using slice
:
r.table("posts").order_by("date").slice(11,21).run(conn)
Last, if you have a secondary index, you can use the between command in conjunction with order_by and limit
. This is extremely efficient, but it requires starting each fetch by looking up a record by actual index value. That is, instead of fetching the 11th record with the number 15
, you need to fetch it by the value it has in the indexed field.
Suppose you wanted to paginate through a set of users, 25 at a time. You could get the first 25 records efficiently just with limit
.
r.table("users").order_by(:index => "name"}).limit(25).run(conn)
For each successive page, start with the last name in the previous page.
r.table("users").between(last_name, r.maxval, {:left_bound => "open",
:index => "name"}).order_by({:index => "name"}).limit(25).run(conn)
We pass the last_name
saved from the previous set to between
as the start index. For the end index, we pass nil
to return documents from the start index to the table’s end. The left_bound
parameter tells between
not to include the first record, since it was already returned as part of the previous page.
You can count the number of documents with a count
command:
r.table("posts").count.run
You can compute the average value of a field with the avg
command.
r.table("posts").avg("num_comments").run
Suppose we’d like to to retrieve all the posts in the table post
and
also return an additional field, comments
, which is an array of all
the comments for the relevant post retrieved from the comments
table. We could do this using a subquery:
r.table("posts").merge{ |post|
{
"comments" => r.table("comments").filter{ |comment|
comment["id_post"].eq(post["id"])
}.coerce_to("ARRAY")
}
}.run
Suppose the table marks
stores the marks of every students per course:
[
{
:name => "William Adama",
:mark => 90,
:id => 1,
:course => "English"
},
{
:name => "William Adama",
:mark => 70,
:id => 2,
:course => "Mathematics"
},
{
:name => "Laura Roslin",
:mark => 80,
:id => 3,
:course => "English"
},
{
:name => "Laura Roslin",
:mark => 80,
:id => 4,
:course => "Mathematics"
}
]
You may be interested in retrieving the results in this format:
[
{
:name => "Laura Roslin",
:Mathematics => 80,
:English => 80
},
{
:name => "William Adama",
:Mathematics => 70,
:English => 90
}
]
In this case, you can do a pivot operation with the group
and
coerce_to
commands.
r.db('test').table('marks').group('name').map { |row|
[row['course'], row['mark']]
}.ungroup().map { |res|
r.expr({name: res['group']}).merge(res['reduction'].coerce_to('object'))
}.run(conn)
Note: A nicer syntax will eventually be added. See the Github issue 838 to track progress.
Doing an unpivot operation to “cancel” a pivot one can be done with the concat_map
,
map
and keys
commands:
r.table("pivoted_marks").concat_map { |doc|
doc.without("id", "name").keys().map { |course|
{
:name => doc["name"],
:course => course,
:mark => doc[course]
}
}
)
Note: A nicer syntax will eventually be added. See the Github issue 838 to track progress.
Suppose we want to rename the field id
to id_user
when retrieving
documents from the table users
. We could do:
r.table("users").map{ |user|
# Add the field id_user that is equal to the id one
user.merge({
"id_user" => user["id"]
})
.without("id") # Remove the field id
}
ReQL has commands for extracting parts of dates and times, including year, month, day, dayOfWeek and more. You can use these with group to group by various intervals. Suppose you had a table of invoices and wanted to retrieve them in groups ordered by year and month:
r.table('invoices').group(
[r.row['date'].year(), r.row['date'].month()]
).ungroup().merge(
{:invoices => r.row['reduction'], :month => r.row['group']}
).without('reduction', 'group').order_by('month').run(conn)
(We also use the technique for renaming a field, described above, to give the names “reduction” and “group” more useful names of “invoices” and “month.”) You could use any combination of the ReQL date/time interval commands in the group, or work with the date/time as a native object.
Currently, ReQL has a default limit of 100,000 elements in an array, and the implementation of group
requires the total number of documents grouped to fit within that boundary, so you are limited to 100,000 invoices. This can be changed, however, by passing the array_limit
option to run. (Also note that ungroup
always returns an array, although this may change in a future version. Follow issue #2719 for progress on this.)
You can also use this approach with a compound index on the intervals you want to group:
r.table('invoices').index_create('by_day') { |doc|
[doc['date'].year(), doc['date'].month(), doc['date'].day()]
}.run(conn)
Then you can use that index in the group
function. This query would return the highest-value invoice for each day.
r.table('invoices').group({:index => 'by_day'}).max('price').run(conn)
Efficiently generating monotonically increasing IDs in a distributed system is a surprisingly difficult problem. If an inserted document is missing a primary key, RethinkDB currently generates a random UUID. We will be supporting additional autogeneration schemes in the future (see https://github.com/rethinkdb/rethinkdb/issues/117), but in the meantime, you can use one of the available open-source libraries for distributed id generation (e.g. twitter snowflake).
When you issue a write query (insert
, delete
, update
, or
replace
), RethinkDB returns a summary object that looks like this:
{"deleted"=>0, "replaced"=>0, "unchanged"=>0, "errors"=>0, "skipped"=>0, "inserted"=>1}
The most important field of this object is errors
. Generally
speaking, if no exceptions are thrown and errors
is 0 then the write
did what it was supposed to. (RethinkDB throws an exception when it
isn’t even able to access the table; it sets the errors
field if it
can access the table but an error occurs during the write. This
convention exists so that batched writes don’t abort halfway through
when they encounter an error.)
The following fields are always present in this object:
inserted
– Number of new documents added to the database.deleted
– Number of documents deleted from the database.replaced
– Number of documents that were modified.unchanged
– Number of documents that would have been modified, except that the new value was the same as the old value.skipped
– Number of documents that were unmodified in a write operation, because the document is not available to be deleted or updated. The document might have been deleted by a different operation happening concurrently, or in the case of a get
operation the key might not exist.errors
– Number of documents that were left unmodified due to an error.In addition, the following two fields are set as circumstances dictate:
generated_keys
– If you issue an insert query where some or all of the rows lack primary keys, the server will generate primary keys for you and return an array of those keys in this field. (The order of this array will match the order of the rows in your insert query.)first_error
– If errors
is positive, the text of the first error message encountered will be in this field. This is a very useful debugging aid. (We don’t return all of the errors because a single typo can result in millions of errors when operating on a large database.)Sometimes you may want to write a ReQL document with a dynamic key—the field name is stored in a variable. You can do this with the object
command, which takes a list of keys and values ((key, value, key, value ...)
) and returns an object from them.
r.table('users').get(1).update(r.object(property_name, value)).run(conn)
The field name can be determined entirely on the server, too. For instance, to update a field whose name is drawn from the value of another field:
r.table('users').for_each{ |doc|
r.table('users').get(doc['id']).update(r.object(doc['field'], new_value))
}.run(conn)
For a practical example, imagine a data set like the one from the pivot example, where each document represents a student’s course record.
[
{
:name => "John",
:mark => 70,
:id => 1,
:course => "Mathematics"
},
{
:name => "John",
:mark => 90,
:id => 2,
:course => "English"
}
]
But you’d like to get a document more like a “report card”:
{
"Mathematics" => 70,
"English" => 90
}
You can accomplish this with object
and a pivot.
r.table('marks').filter({:student => 'John'}).map{ |mark|
r.object(mark['course'], mark['mark'])
}.reduce{ |left, right| left.merge(right) }.run(conn)
For testing or logging purposes, you might want to capture a created ReQL query as a string. (You can see an example of this in ReQL error messages.) While there is no ReQL command to do this, you can simply use the inspect()
method at the end of a query chain, rather than run()
:
r.table('users').filter{ |user| user['groups'].contains('operators')}.inspect()
It’s a common pattern in some query interfaces to “build” queries programmatically by instantiating a query object, calling it several times in succession to add query commands, then calling the execution command. This lets you dynamically change the query based on conditions at runtime. You might expect to do this in ReQL like so:
query = r.table('posts')
query.filter(request.filter) if request.filter
query.order_by('date')
query.run(conn)
However, that won’t work! The reason is that the query object doesn’t store state. Each of the commands after the first one is simply running on the original value of query
(in this case, the posts
table). You can solve this by explicitly assigning the output of each new command to the query
variable:
query = r.table('posts')
query = query.filter(request.filter) if request.filter
query = query.order_by('date')
query = query.run(conn)
You might want to produce a “union” changefeed to watch multiple tables or queries on just one feed. Since the union
command works with changes
, ReQL makes this fairly straightforward. To monitor two tables at once:
r.table('table1').union(r.table('table2')).changes().run(conn)
You might want to “tag” the tables to make it clear which changes belong to which table.
r.table("table1").merge({:table => "table1"}).union(
r.table("table2").merge({:table => "table2"}).changes().run(conn)
Also, you can use changes
with each query rather than after the whole.
r.table("table1").filter({:flag => "blue"}).changes().union(
r.table("table2").filter({:flag => "red"}).changes()
).run(conn)